Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than the LG K92's score of 85.4. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features. The Galaxy A51 5G body is just a little lighter but just a bit thicker than LG K92, and both were released with only a few months difference.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better processor than LG K92. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a bit better pixels density.
LG K92 counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and the same sensor size, the LG K92 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.