Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Titan gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a bit better than LG K92's 85.4 global score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction has the same thickness than LG K92, but it's just a little lighter.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better processing power than LG K92. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little greater display pixel density.
The LG K92 counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a back camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.