Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Titan gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than the LG K92, getting a 91.1 score against 85.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10. The Galaxy A52s body has the same thickness than the LG K92, but it's a bit lighter. Galaxy A52s features a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a 64 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG K92 features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.