Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, having an 85.4 score against 75.8. The LG K92 is a extremely newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A6, although it's way heavier and a bit thicker. LG K92 features a little sharper display than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixels number per inch of screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The LG K92 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG K92 also has 3 GB more RAM. The LG K92 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 has longer battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG K92 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera, a way larger back camera sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG K92, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.