Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a overall score of 85.4 against 76.9. The LG K92 design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70's, although it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). LG K92 and Samsung Galaxy A70 count with very similar processors, both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
LG K92 and Galaxy A70 both have really similar displays, both have a display with the same size, the same display density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The LG K92 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG K92 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better battery performance than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
LG K92 costs more than Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.