Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the LG K92, with a score of 87.5 against 85.4. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy A71 body is lighter and a little thinner than the LG K92, despite of the fact that it was released about 9 months before.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little bit better performance than LG K92. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a display that's very similar to the screen in LG K92, they have the same display pixel density, a display of the same size and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A71 features a little bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with a 64 megapixels and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
The LG K92 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A71 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 costs a bit more money than LG K92, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.