Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 overall score. These phones have the same Android 10 OS, so both should give you very similar operating system features. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body has the same thickness than LG K92, but it's a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better screen than LG K92. Both of them have a display with the same size, the same screen pixels density and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px. LG K92 has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit longer battery life than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than LG K92, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.