Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 score. LG K92's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A8 (2018), but it is heavier. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s processor is just as good as the processor in LG K92, and although the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen. The LG K92 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K92 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 features superior battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.