Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titan gray | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), having an 85.4 score against 85.2. The LG K92 is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), although it's a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit better performance than LG K92. They have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a screen that's very similar to LG K92's screen, although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a quite worse amount of pixels per screen inch, a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution. The LG K92 has a superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
LG K92 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K92 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.