Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-06 | -- |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy Alpha's general score of 76.3. LG K92 is a extremely heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4.
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with a little more vivid screen than LG K92, although it has a way smaller screen, a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a little lower count of pixels per inch of display. LG K92 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Alpha features a bit better processing unit than LG K92, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. LG K92 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The LG K92 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG K92 is more expensive than the Galaxy Alpha, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.