Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Titan gray | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than the Galaxy F41, with a global score of 85.4 against 85.2. Even though LG K92 and the Galaxy F41 were released with only a couple of months difference, LG K92's construction is just a bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy F41. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has 10 version while Galaxy F41 has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bit better processing unit than LG K92. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy F41 has a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG K92 counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.