Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than LG K92's overall score of 85.4. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is thinner than LG K92, although it's way heavier and was released just a little more than a year before. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG K92 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some extra features.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processor than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold has a display that's just as good as the LG K92 one, because although the Galaxy Fold has a quite worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution and a little larger display.
Galaxy Fold has a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG K92, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold has a bit longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. The LG K92 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG K92, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.