Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Titan gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. LG K92 is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy M20, but it's just a bit heavier. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The LG K92 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy M20 has a display that's just as good as the LG K92 one, because although the Galaxy M20 has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixels density. LG K92 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light situations, a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution, a way better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
The LG K92 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M20 counts with improved battery performance than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.