Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Titan gray | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M21, getting a global score of 85.4 against 84.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG K92 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M21 has Android 11 version. Although the LG K92 and the Samsung Galaxy M21 were only released 8 months apart, the LG K92 body is a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M21.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy M21 features a bit more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
The LG K92 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video quality, the LG K92 also has a bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with much more MP. LG K92 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M21, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M21 counts with a much better battery performance than LG K92, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.