Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the LG K92, with a score of 87.7 against 85.4. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 10 operating system. The Galaxy M51 is a better cellphone than LG K92, we must note that it is also just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a little better hardware performance than LG K92. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Galaxy M51 has a display that's very similar to the LG K92 one, and although the Galaxy M51 has a little worse pixel number per screen inch and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. The Galaxy M51 has a little bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a 64 mega pixels camera, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photos.
The LG K92 features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.