Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Titan gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is a bit better than LG K92's 85.4 overall score. The Galaxy Note 20 is a a little lighter device than the LG K92, but both are 0.33inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit sharper screen than LG K92. Both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same pixels density and a screen of the same size.
Galaxy Note 20 has a little faster processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM. The LG K92 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the LG K92 also counts with faster video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG K92 has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better battery life than LG K92, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG K92, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.