Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 3, with an 85.4 score against 81.2. LG K92 is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note 3, but both have the same thickness. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has 10 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little faster processor than LG K92, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a more vivid screen than LG K92, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The LG K92 counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG K92 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
LG K92 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy Note 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG K92, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Note 3, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.