Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting an 85.4 score against 79.3. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has the newer 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. The LG K92 construction is notably newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixel count per inch of display. LG K92 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more processing cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM.
LG K92 captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG K92 also has a much bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
LG K92 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. LG K92 features superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG K92 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.