Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. The LG K92 design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG K92 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better processing power than LG K92, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG K92 features a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a larger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The LG K92 features longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG K92 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.