Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than the LG K92, having an 89 score against 85.4. The Galaxy Note10 body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG K92, even though it was released just 15 months before. Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The LG K92 features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note10 has a little faster processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
LG K92 has a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG K92 counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K92. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG K92, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.