Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is just a bit better than LG K92, with an 86.2 score against 85.4. The Galaxy Note10 Lite is an older and a bit thicker device than LG K92, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than LG K92. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG K92. They have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a same size screen.
LG K92 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K92 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
LG K92 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.