Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5, having an 85.4 score against 80.2. LG K92's body is way newer than the Galaxy Note5's, although it is heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy Note5 and LG K92 both feature extremely similar processors, and although the Galaxy Note5 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG K92 has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
LG K92 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.