Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Titan gray | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note8's overall score of 83. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG K92 has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the LG K92 is a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note8, it's a little thinner and a lot newer.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG K92. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Note8 has just a bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG K92 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
LG K92 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG K92 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy Note8.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.