Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Titan gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than the LG K92, with an 88.3 score against 85.4. The Galaxy S10 is an older cellphone than LG K92, but Samsung managed to make it much lighter and a bit thinner. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a much better display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
LG K92 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger sensor and a lot more megapixels back facing camera. The LG K92 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG K92 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.