Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 395.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a little bit better than LG K92, with an 89.7 score against 85.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is an older cellphone than LG K92, but Samsung made it a little lighter and a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than LG K92. Both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same display pixel density and a display of the same size.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG K92, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, a lower video quality and a tinier camera aperture, they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor.
The LG K92 features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.