Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Titan gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the LG K92, getting an 86.3 score against 85.4. Galaxy S10e's body is a little bit thinner and much lighter than LG K92, although it was released about 20 months before. Galaxy S10e features a bit superior processor than LG K92. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel number per display inch. LG K92 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 has greater battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3100mAh. LG K92 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs a little more money than the LG K92, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.