Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is better than LG K92's 85.4 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and LG K92 has Android 10, providing some additional features. The Galaxy S20 design is a little bit thinner and lighter than the LG K92, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG K92, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 has a more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
LG K92 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and faster video frame rate.
LG K92 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the LG K92 one.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG K92, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.