Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 general score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10. The Galaxy S20 FE body has the same thickness than LG K92, but it's just a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number per screen inch. The LG K92 features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K92 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S20 FE has a little better hardware performance than LG K92. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The LG K92 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S20 FE costs more than LG K92, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.