Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the LG K92, with a general score of 98 against 85.4. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while LG K92 has Android 10. Although it's the best phone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster CPU than LG K92, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little more vivid display than LG K92, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a greater pixel density and a quite bigger display.
The LG K92 has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size sensor and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better video definition and a back camera with a way better 108 MP resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG K92, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.