Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 is slightly better than the LG K92, getting a global score of 91.8 against 85.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S21 has 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S21's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG K92, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy S21 has a bit better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S21 has a better display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S21 also counts with a little greater pixel density.
LG K92 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S21, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the LG K92 also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. LG K92 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S21, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 and the Samsung Galaxy S21 feature quite similar battery durations.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG K92, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.