Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Titan gray | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 98.1, which is better than LG K92's general score of 85.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is better than the LG K92, we must note that it is also a heavier and a little bit thicker device. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features.
Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than LG K92, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little bit bigger display and more pixels per inch of display. LG K92 has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more MP, a lot better video definition and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy S21 Ultra has greater battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K92. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the LG K92, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.