Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Titan gray | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the LG K92, getting a 93.4 score against 85.4. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while LG K92 has Android 10. The Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and a little thinner than LG K92. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a lot better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number in each screen inch.
The LG K92 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little better performance than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The LG K92 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. Galaxy S22 captures a bit better photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG K92. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG K92, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.