Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Titan gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the LG K92, getting a 95.4 score against 85.4. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than LG K92, it's a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than LG K92, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The LG K92 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features superior battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than LG K92, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a much higher video quality and a way larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K92. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG K92, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.