Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | -- |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.14 ounces | -- |
| Titan gray | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25, with a overall score of 85.4 against 82.6. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the LG K92 has the older 10 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
LG K92 features a way better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The LG K92 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes slightly better photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a way lower 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video resolution.
LG K92 and Galaxy S25 count with incredibly similar batteries duration.
LG K92 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.