Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | -- |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.14 ounces | -- |
| Titan gray | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the LG K92's score of 85.4. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while LG K92 has Android 10, so it provides you some extra features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than LG K92.
LG K92 counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than LG K92, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit bigger display and a greater screen pixels density.
The LG K92 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features improved battery life than LG K92, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG K92, because it has a larger aperture, a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a lot higher resolution camera and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.