Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Titan gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 85.4 against 75.8. LG K92's construction is notably newer and thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. LG K92 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active features a better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG K92 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S7 Active and LG K92 both feature incredibly similar batteries. The LG K92 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG K92 costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.