Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-06 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, having a score of 85.4 against 78.1. LG K92 is a noticeably newer phone than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but it's a little bit thicker and much heavier. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG K92 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores (although they are slower). Galaxy S7 edge has a little sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG K92 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG K92 features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
LG K92 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG K92 costs more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.