Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Titan gray | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S8, having an 85.4 score against 81.7. Although LG K92 is way newer than the Galaxy S8, it is a little bit thicker and way heavier. Galaxy S8 has a sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a bit better processor than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The LG K92 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K92 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The LG K92 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S8. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy LG K92, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S8, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.