Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, having a overall score of 85.4 against 81.9. The LG K92 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. Galaxy S8 Active features a bit better processor than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a much better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The LG K92 features a way better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K92 has much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S8 Active's battery life is just as good as the battery life in LG K92.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG K92, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.