Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Titan gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than the Galaxy S9, getting a overall score of 85.4 against 83.3. The LG K92 is a heavier phone than the Galaxy S9, but both of them are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better processing power than LG K92, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy S9 has a much better display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The LG K92 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K92 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better resolution.
LG K92 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S9. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy S9, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.