Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 85.4 against 80.1. Even though the LG K92 and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only 7 months difference, the LG K92 is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than LG K92, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel density.
The LG K92 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better battery life than LG K92, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
LG K92 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a way more MP back camera and a lot better video quality.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG K92 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.