Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. The LG K92 is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better display than LG K92, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. LG K92 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little faster processor than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG K92 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG K92 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover Pro, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.