Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titan gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is slightly better than the LG K92's score of 85.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip and the LG K92 were released only 9 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper screen than LG K92, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a little higher pixel density.
The LG K92 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a way bigger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The LG K92 has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG K92. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG K92, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.