Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.77 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the LG K92's global score of 85.4. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the LG K92. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid display than LG K92, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG K92 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. LG K92 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
LG K92 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K92. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG K92, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.