Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titan gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than LG K92, having a general score of 92.3 against 85.4. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the LG K92, although both of them were released with only 3 months difference. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking display than LG K92, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a little higher screen pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
LG K92 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG K92 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than LG K92, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.