Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Titan gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than the LG K92's 85.4 general score. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG K92 were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is somewhat thinner but also extremely heavier than LG K92. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, providing a lot of extra features.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better performance than LG K92, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a little bit larger display.
The LG K92 features a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little bit longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG K92, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.