Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Titan gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.77 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and notably thinner than the LG K92's, but it is incredibly heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and LG K92 feature very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208px resolution and a quite bigger display.
LG K92 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.