Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Titan gray | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 overall score. Although LG K92 and TCL 20 Pro 5G were released only 5 months apart, LG K92's design is a little bit thinner but also a bit heavier than TCL 20 Pro 5G. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG K92 has 10 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
TCL 20 Pro 5G and LG K92 feature incredibly similar displays, they have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, a screen with the same size and the same pixels density. The TCL 20 Pro 5G's processing unit is just as good as LG K92's processing unit, both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. TCL 20 Pro 5G has just a bit more memory for games and applications than LG K92, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K92 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size sensor, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.