Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Titan gray | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the LG K92's global score of 85.4. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the LG K92, it must be noted that it is also a just a little heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a little faster CPU than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit sharper screen than LG K92. They have a higher quantity of pixels per display inch, a screen of the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
LG K92 has a superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes clearer photos and videos than LG K92, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has higher video frame rate and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with better battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.