Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Titan gray | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a little bit better than LG K92, having a global score of 90.1 against 85.4. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a thicker and a little heavier cellphone than LG K92. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 OS. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little more vivid display than LG K92, because it has a little bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a just a bit better number of pixels in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and a 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
LG K92 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with improved battery duration than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.